Everything Everywhere All At Once

#142 at the time of writing.

More than a third of my top 30 films of all time are from the years 1999-2001 - check out my list in the sidebar - and I think that's testament to the age I was when I first watched them (19-21). I was young and impressionable, and the mark those films left on me will stay with me for life.

But that means new-to-me films start at a monumental disadvantage; how can anything new possibly hope to change my life now that I've seen it all before? After thousands of films and increasingly entrenched tastes, how can anything blow my mind anymore?

This is how.

Everything Everywhere All At Once is the most bonkers and ambitious film I have ever seen - and it's about laundry and taxes. That mismatch is part of its genius; it tells an impossibly grand story while remaining grounded throughout. The Daniels went for a maximalist style that conveys how overwhelming our modern world is - but ultimately this is the story of a struggling Chinese immigrant family just trying to get along.

This cerebral sci-fi kung fu thriller does so much exactly right, and manages to be like nothing else I've ever seen. I love that the characters switch between Chinese and English throughout. I love the bagel and the googly eye symbolising nihilism and existentialism. I love the myriad of references to some of my favourite films, especially The Matrix, Ratatouille, and 2001: A Space Odyssey. I love that this was Ke Huy Quan's first major on-screen role since Indiana Jones and The Goonies. I love that Michelle Yeoh cried when she talked about how validated she felt by being asked to play such a versatile character (and, wow, she knocked it out of the park). I loved it so much, that I went back to watch it a second time at the cinema... and then a third time... and then once more at home with my daughter, all within the space of a couple of weeks.

It was released at the same time as another multiverse movie, Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness, which had eight times the budget and wasn't even half as good.

Everything Everywhere All At Once rockets into my favourite films of all time - not just into the top 30, not even the top 10, but the top 3. I'm thrilled that my mind can still be blown.

The Lego Movie

#172 at the time of writing.

I was surprised to see this on IMDb's Top 250 - a brand cash-in flick just doesn't scream high expectations. But the trailer looked fun, so I went to see it with my wife yesterday (we are still children at heart).

So does it deserve the hype? Well... it's good... but I suspect it won't stay on the Top 250 for long. It's very high octane, with lots of laughs, and a sweet ending that caps it off nicely. The story follows a Lego construction worker, who always follows instructions in true Lego style, as he learns the value of occasionally throwing away the manual and unfettering his creativity.

Two things especially struck me: First, that the film is so fast and action-packed in its jerky Lego world that my head was left spinning (probably exacerbated by the 3D). A little too much for me perhaps. However, the amount of effort that the animators went to to make the world seem so expansive and... Lego-ey... is seriously impressive. The amazing attention to detail will be bliss for Lego geeks.

Second, the film is relentlessly po-mo, filled with references to other films, breaking the fourth wall, self-aware story elements and characters that knew they were part of a film, and shamelessly unsubtle cultural references designed to appeal to the cynical and surreal tastes of the Internet generation.

Nice to see that fifteen years later one of my favourite films, The Matrix, is still being parodied...

Inception

#83 at time of writing.

Just came back from watching the IMAX premiere of this with a few friends. I don't think I've come out of a film and talked about the plot - and the ending - so much since Donnie Darko. Without giving anything away, the last ten seconds of the film show something completely mundane, but had the whole room on the edge of their seats. When the screen went black, there was a collective gasp and spontaneous applause.

So, definitely entertaining. Definitely tense. Sufficiently clever and ambiguous to stir up a few hours of après-film conversation. Christopher Nolan has successfully maintained his near miraculous record of directorial excellence.

The central concept of stealing (and planting) ideas within people's dreams allows for some beautiful images of bending cities and gravity-defying hyperreality. Inception owes a lot to The Matrix, perhaps with sprinklings of Synecdoche, New York. Subtle it is not, but who needs subtle - this is Hollywood.

However, it has flaws.

Don't get me wrong, I heartily recommend this film. It's a big-screen film, confident and ambitious. But I think it suffers (although not nearly as fatally) from the same problem as the Matrix sequels. (Let's speak of them just this once, and then never again.) It is an overdose of exposition plus action. The plot is so complicated and so carefully laid out that character and emotional involvement feel squeezed into the edges.

As far as dream-within-a-dream films go this might beat Vanilla Sky, but I prefer the disorientation of eXistenZ or the emotion of Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind. Still, I would gladly watch Inception again.

(Side note, David Walliams was sat behind us!)

V for Vendetta

#180 at time of writing.

We went to see this film at the IMAX at Waterloo last week. What a great film for the IMAX screen: a grandiose comic book melodrama of the highest order. Dark and satisfying.

The strength of vision behind this dystopian fantasy of a totalitarian Britain sweeps you along, so that you whole-heartedly believe in the ambiguous hero. His antics are gloriously theatrical, occasionally histrionic, but always entertaining. It's Nineteen Eighty-Four meets Zorro.

This is a welcome return to form for the Wachowski brothers after the woeful Matrix sequels. OK, V for Vendetta didn't blow me away as much as The Matrix on first viewing, but I have a creeping feeling that I will want to watch V again, and again.

It's a shame that the genius author of the graphic novel behind this film did not approve of this adaptation of his masterwork. Mind you, he hasn't yet approved of any adaptations of his comic inventions.

"A revolution without dancing is a revolution not worth having!"